Posts Tagged ‘Spanish Civil War’
Review of Living Anarchism – José Peirats and the Spanish Anarcho-Syndicalist Movement
Living Anarchism – José Peirats and the Spanish Anarcho-Syndicalist Movement by Chris Ealham [AK Press] Available here.
This review first published in Ideas and Action (Oct 2017).
On the cover of Living Anarchism, the publishers, AK Press, point out that the anarchist movement in Spain in the lead up to the revolution in 1936-37 was the ‘the largest anti-authoritarian movement’ ever created in the world. It numbered in the hundreds of thousands and resulted from a conscious and deliberate intervention by anarchists in the everyday world of work and community. Anarchists sought to build a new world in the shell of the old and they were surprisingly successful in significant ways. Living Anarchism is testimony to this. Not a history of Spanish anarchism as such, it is nonetheless a window into the life of that movement seen through the life of one its key activist, José Peirats.
So who was José Peirats? The son of labourers from Valencia province, he moved to Barcelona at a young age with his family in search of work and a future. Suffering illness and numerous privations, Peirats eventually found a home in one of the city’s vibrant rationalist schools. However his education was short-lived and at a young age he entered the workforce proper as a brick-maker. Gravitating to the anarcho-syndicalist union, the Confederación Nacional del Trabajo (CNT), he became a key activist in the L’Hospitalet area of Barcelona. Peirats lived through it all: at the young age of 28 he was in Barcelona as the Spanish Revolution got underway. He witnessed the enormous achievements and hope that the revolution generated and he witnessed, in time, its demise and defeat. In exile at the age of 31 he spent a great deal of the remainder of life documenting the rise of Spain’s anarchist movement, going on the produce The CNT in the Spanish Revolution – an extensive, three volume history of the largest workers’ union in Spain at the outbreak of the Spanish Civil War. In the last period of his life he said,
“I’ve done almost everything in the CNT: I’ve organised strikes, organised workers, spoken in assemblies, meetings, and given conferences, written articles, attended congresses, used pistols, and, some- times, explosives; I’ve been in jail and collected lawsuits, mainly for libelous press articles. I know what it means to be naked and take a beating in a police station. I was the only secretary of the CNT in exile to enter Spain clandestinely when they were still shooting people!”
Living Anarchism is broken into ten sections (if one includes the excellent summation) which can broadly be divided into two parts – the period leading up to the revolution and period after the revolution’s defeat. If the first section of the book is then a celebration of what anarchism was capable of building when its activists put their minds to it, then the second section is, in contrast, the tragedy of defeat at the hands of fascism and what that came to mean.
Exile
Exiled to South America and later France, Peirats struggled like many of his comrades to make sense of the defeat that had befallen the anarchist movement in Spain. Defeat is never easy and the tragedy was compounded by exile and isolation. A movement of Spanish anarchists abroad came into being but it was riven with division and acrimony. Peirats, more than most, understood the dilemma: the past could not be ignored and yet the movement, if it was to survive and rebuild, needed to move on too. It was a delicate and difficult line to walk along.
Peirats was clearly a product of the university of the class struggle and his early years and reputation as a resolute union activist in the cauldron of Barcelona was something that he never departed from. However, another side to the activist was his strong interest in the practice and spirit of anti-authoritarianism. A significant part of his life – perhaps deriving from his own early exposure to the rationalist/ free school movement in Barcelona – involved a commitment to the ‘athenaeum’: essentially self-organised community centres envisaged as ‘a focal point of social ferment’ for the locality around it. These centres hosted a library, debates, music recitals, evening classes and threatre productions. Before and during the revolution, as well as afterwards in exile, it was this activity surrounding the ‘athenaeum’ that Peirats returned to and was involved with again and again.
Although the person who emerges from his book appears exceptional in many respects, Peirats would have been the first to dispute this, it seems. Describing himself at one point as a ‘worker ant’ he believed himself to be very much a part and a product of the CNT. Clearly he was a talented activist, writer and organiser, but there emerges from this biography a man whose dedication to revolutionary change was absolute. By no means without faults – and this is explored in Living Anarchism – Peirats nevertheless had an abiding grasp of the importance and value of anarchist ideas. Given that he had witnessed the highest point of achievement and an avalanche of low points in its aftermath, he remained largely upbeat, understating near the end, ‘I did what I could despite many obstacles’.
Durruti
In terms of Spanish anarchism we hear a great deal about people like Durruti but activists like Jose Peirats, it seems to me, were a lot closer to the soul of Spanish anarchism. For Peirats anarchism was about democracy, education and the class struggle. In contrast Durruti was far more liable to be off taking a pot shot at some bishop or other – a headline grabbing activity but not necessarily as productive as it sounds or looks.
In 2010, the historian Chris Ealham produced what is undoubtedly one of the best social and political histories of anarchism, namely Anarchism and the City – the story of the rise of anarchism in the Catalonia port city of Barcelona. Now with this account of Peirat’s life he had done us a further service. He admits at the outset that ‘there are many aspects of Peirats life that he finds admirable’ and while this must certainly colour this work, it does not distract from what is a clear and concise account of an anarchist activist’s lived life in revolution and defeat.
Matters have moved on hugely since the revolution in Spain in 1936-37 and Peirats as much as anyone saw this in full measure by the time his life came to an end in 1989. However there is a great deal to learn from this book. The Spanish anarchists combined a practice of militant class struggle with a broad visionary belief in human desire and emancipation. Whatever about claims, dreams and aspirations, in the end it takes people to make politics happen: Peirats was clearly one of those who excelled at this task.
A book to read and treasure.
75th Anniversary of the Spanish Revolution!
This month, 75 years ago, one of the most significant democratic movements in human history got underway in Spain.
The onset of the Spanish Civil War will be remembered by many for the tragic and valiant struggle that took place in Spain to stem the tide of fascism in Europe. It is certainly important to remember and celebrate that struggle that took place in Spain between 1936-39. But less well known and more important – to my mind – was the democratic revolution that took place in Spain between 1936 and 1937. It was an immense revolution and it ushered in a new economic and social order where workers and farm labourers organised and controlled this places of work and their communities. For an important and significant period of time a different way of organising society and economic production – where human needs came ahead of profits – held sway.
Let’s face it, in today’s world – where inequality is rampant; where poverty and starvation is rife while the world’s wealthy party on; and where environmental destruction seems never ending – it is important to remember and cherish this possible way forward for human kind.
Even now the scale of the revolution and the its achievements are not fully acknowledged. Although this is a situation that is gradually being reversed – with more academic research now focused on this important revolutionary period in Spain’s history.
Over the long period of this anniversary I hope to look at different aspects of the revolution and its eventual fate. There’s no real plan here other than to cover topics of interest whilst completing research for a fictional work that is in part set in revolutionary Spain – of which more much later on.
But first a salute to those that resisted dictatorship and fascism and in the process opened up a real window of hope for a viable and free socialist society.
Related articles and further reading:
- Anarchist sources on The Spanish Revolution
Franco’s Victims and ‘culture of terror’ in Spain
I met CNT activist Manuel Garcia at this year’s Dublin Anarchist Bookfair where he was speaking about the CNT’s successes in organising workers in the Andalucía region. The anarchist movement in Spain is now in the process of rebuilding its influence among workers and the efforts of activists such as Manuel is central to the success that they are having. On this occasion I wanted to speak to Manuel about the legacy of the Franco dictatorship. (Translation for this interview was kindly provided by José Antonio Gutiérrez Danton.)
KD: The talk you gave just now was excellent. But I want to ask you about a different, though connected, struggle that is ongoing throughout Spain at this present time. This is what is known as the movement for the recovery of historical memory. What can you tell me about this?
MG: As you know the situation on July 19th 1936 was different in different areas of Spain. In many places the people rose up and the revolution triumphed. But in Andalucía the army had the upper hand very early on. So, in effect, in much of Andalucía the people were free for only a very short time. So you cannot properly speak of a civil war in the region. Rather, from the outset, there was a massive act of repression. When the coup happened, within one week, almost the entire region of Andalucía was in the control of the Nationalist troops – that is the Francoist troops that were coming across from Morocco. The truth is that tens of thousands of people died immediately at their hands.
KD: In Andalucía where was the resistance successful?
MG: There was some armed resistance in the mountains of Huelva and in Seville itself but in most places thousands of people were summarily executed. They had no guns in their hands. In the east of Andalucía, the resistance to Franco lasted the longest – around Almeria and that region. But here the repression when it came was even harsher. There is a particularly infamous event that is well documented. As people were fleeing from the Malaga area towards Almeria, after the collapse of the front there, thousands and thousand died on the roads just trying to get refuge. They were bombed and shot down from the skies. It was a slaughter.
KD: What happened once Franco had won the Civil War?
MG: In fact even when the Franco’s dictatorship had won they still considered the situation to be one of war and a veritable war was waged against the workers. In political and cultural terms it was waged with the purpose of annihilating any vestige of resistance. The 40s and the 50s were very harsh years. In other words then we are not only talking about people who were annihilated during this mass initial repression but we are talking about the thousands who were executed later on.
KD: What sort of numbers are we talking about?
MG: It is very hard to know how many died. There is no full record as such. And many of the executions were carried out summarily. And not just by the authorities but often just by the local boss or landowner. This is something of interest to the movement for the recovery of historical memory now. They are trying to piece together exactly what happened. There is a website called ‘We Want All The Names’ which is trying to get the name of each and every person who was executed. It wants to place a short biog with each name to record the situation of all those who suffered repression. This is a job that is being carried out in a very local way.
KD: Is the movement led by families and relatives or by political activists?
MG: Both. This effort is being driven by militants of the left but also in many many cases by relatives. The most important thing for many involved is actually to recover the bodies of the victims and give them a proper dignified burial.
KD: How has the anarchist movement related to his process and movement?
MG: Anarchists are very involved with this movement. As you know anarchism was a very big movement in the lead up to July 1936 and in particular the anarchist oriented union – the CNT – was a key organisation in the revolution. Furthermore the unions and the union movement itself were the main targets of the repression. And it’s fair to say that the CNT in particular was targeted. So we are very involved with the movement to recover historical memory. But not only in the sense of identifying the victims and what happened in this and that situation. As anarchists we are also involved in order to bring awareness on the social structures created and fostered by the dictatorship. What we are talking about here is specifically the culture of fear, of terror that has survived the dictatorship and that is alive in Spain today. There is still a real fear about getting involved in struggles because of the culture of terror that the Franco regime imbedded in society. This fear is alive and it is important to challenge it. So the movement to recovery memory also has an important role to play in addressing this big issue.
KD: It is a very difficult process to go through but necessary? Is that so?
MG: Yes, that is how it is. But it is very necessary because thirty years on from the end of the dictatorship many people who suffered repression are still afraid to speak. And that in part is because repression became a taboo subject for many families. This of course is what the dictatorship wanted. The repression that occurred was very effective in the sense that whole families were criminalised and stigmatised by the regime and the authorities. And this, in many cases, had the effect that the regime desired.
KD: Can you give an example?
MG: Well instead of opposing the regime some people reacted against the Left saying ‘My family was killed because of those ideas (i.e. the ideas of anarchism say)’. And then they often tried to rationalise the situation – the tragedies that had been visited on their families – by saying, ‘Oh look my father was not an anarchist or was not a communist. He was just a good chap and he was killed by mistake.’ So in many cases the response was what the Franco regime wanted deep down: people shied away at a very close level from some of the tragic events that happened around them.
KD: So the present upsurge in efforts to identify victims is a challenge to that?
MG: Yes, in that sense it is very good for Spanish society. And of course it is also very good for people as individuals. Many are finding out their family history for the first time. For example they discover that their grandfather was a militant with the CNT. The family lore may provided some information for example that their grandfather was ‘unusual’ and ‘had never got married but had a family’ or stuff like that. But by looking more closely and delving into the past they discover that say this grandfather had a CNT card. This gives people an understanding of what happened. So they find out the politics of their own family – that they may have been anarchists, communists or republicans – and that there was a reason for those things that may have happened to their families during the time of the dictatorship.
KD: How has the Spanish state reacted to this movement?
MG: There is a law of historical memory. But it is a very restrictive and now they are not even implementing it. So in most cases the work that has been done so far has been done by people acting as individuals. In fact in over 90% of cases it has been down to individual efforts that the graves of victims have been found. And a further example of the opposition in the Spanish state is the prosecution of Judge Garcon who is standing trial now. And for us as anarchist, our view is that this opposition is proof that the current society is in many ways the direct heir of the Franco dictatorship.
KD: The process of recovery memory has accelerated over the last while. Do you have a view as to why this is so?
MG: It’s a complicated matter. The CNT and all sections of the revolutionary left since the democratic opening at the end of the formal dictatorship in 1975 have been fighting for a social memory in order to purge the state apparatus – the judiciary and the police, the military – of fascist elements. But also in order to create awareness of what forty years of dictatorship has meant and what been its effect over ordinary people. For example we have argued that it is very important to rehabilitate the memories of those who resisted not just during the Civil War but actually after. Until recently many of those who opposed the dictatorship were considered as brigands and nothing more. Now the process of finding out what really went on is well underway.
KD: Many thanks for time comrades and my thanks to our fine translator.
Liberty Hall, Dublin May 2010.
Review: Death In El Valle and Franco’s Victims
I came across Death In El Valle while researching the work of the Association For the Recovery of Historical Memory . The ARMH has been collecting information about the victims of Franco’s Spain since its foundation in 2000. It has played a major role in identifying many mass execution sites and has instituted legal moves to have these sites excavated and the remains of those found identified and given proper burials. It is safe to say that their work has gone a long way towards uncovering the real horror that was Franco’s Spain.
Death In El Valle is a documentary, in Spanish and English, by US photographer CM Hardt about the particular circumstances of her grandfather’s death. CM Hardt’s was born in the United States of Spanish parents. She returned to Spain over the years with her parents to see her grandmother and her wider extended family. It was via these visits that she heard about the death of her grandfather whom, it seems, was involved in the resistance movement that lived on in Spain well after the Civil War itself had ended. Intrigued she made inquiries and learned that her grandfather was betrayed by a local villager and died not long after his arrest. However she wasn’t able to find out much more than that.
The documentary is a record of her journey to uncover the truth. Gradually she finds out exactly what happened, how and, for the most part, why. She is particularly interested – naturally enough – in who might have betrayed her grandfather and a share of the documentary focuses on finding out more about this – to no real avail. Fingers are pointed and rumours abound but there is no definitive answer. Instead, Hardt discovers the name of Guardia Civil officer who was present on the night her grandfather was murdered. It emerges that it was an extra judicial execution. Her grandfather was told to run and then shot for trying to escape.
Franco’s Spain and present, modern-day Spain collide in the meeting between Hardt and the now retired policeman. Like many Spaniards this policeman lives in an apartment block in a busy residential area. He could be any man that you meet anywhere in Spain except that he has an ugly past to hide. At first, he is forthcoming about the general events of that night. He is a bit surprised, it must be said, to be confronted by the victim’s granddaughter. But as Hardt attempts to pry further, to find out more, he clams up. Subsequently, he refuses to meet her again.
Death In El Valle is let down by its narrow focus. The context of what was really at stake in Spain during the Civil War is not explored. True, many people know about the general outline of the Civil War and why it happened, but there is no wider exploration of what forces were at play. We are left with the very nebulous description – beloved of the middle stream – that the Spanish Civil War was about ‘saving democracy’. In fact it was a great deal more. See here for more. Properly speaking the Civil War and its aftermath was about defeating a revolution – regarded by many as perhaps the most thoroughgoing social revolution ever seen on this planet. In response Franco and his forces attempted to ‘eradicate’ the left (across the spectrum). It was a ferocious and unforgiving assault – the after effects of which are still being felt.
Nonetheless Death In El Valle is engaging and provocative. It is well produced and moving: the fact that it is a record of a real journey of investigation gives it an extra edge. It is disturbing too though. As anyone who has attempted this sort of thing will testify, unearthing the past seems like a straightforward quest until one actually goes about it. The realities of Franco’s Spain adds a whole other dimension of difficulty to Hardt’s endeavour. As Death In El Valle amply shows, today in Spain, there are many who are fearful of that time and what they did to survive . There are also plenty of others who just want to forget the period and how awful it was.
For further information on both the documentary and its director, as well as information on how to acquire a copy of the DVD, see the links above. Promotional clips from Death In El Valle are here
Orwell on the Aragon Front

Anarchism In Huesca: CNT Poster May Day 09
George Orwell fought on the Aragon Front in the Spanish Civil War around Alcubierre and later near Huesca. One of the front line positions he fought at has been preserved and reconstructed and is well worth a visit.
I drove south out of Huesca on the N330. About 15 kms out there is a signpost turning for Alcubierre. Heading east along this road it is narrow and flat. The land on either side is under cultivation but it seems otherwise to be an arid and dry area. There are low hills further east, to the north and south, Los Monegros.
Alcubierre is a small town. Orwell in not very complementary to then village where he spent some days before being sent to a position at the front, to the west. He was there in the dead of winter but it was early summer when I visited. It is hard now to imagine what it must have been like but Orwell makes a point of telling us how cold and muddy it was there during his stay.
His period in and around Alcubierre is notable for a number of reasons though. Firstly it was in Alcubierre that he received his first weapon for use in the war against fascism. He said though: ‘I got a shock of dismay when I saw the thing they gave me.’ It turned out to be a gun more than 40 years old – a German Mauser from 1896! Indeed the reality of ‘civil war within the civil war’ that was, at this time, beginning to gain momentum on the Republican side was brought home to him starkly by this key incident. He described the gun as follows: ‘It was rusty, the bolt was stiff, the wooden barrel-guard was split; once glance down the muzzle showed that it was corroded and past praying for’.
Alcubierre reminded me of a small market town in Ireland though it a lot dryer and hotter of course. But there was as they say a good country smell in the air. In front of the town hall, there was a kids’ playground area. The town hall itself was under renovation. A small cafe was open but overall it seemed like a sleepy place. But then I was there in and around siesta time. There were no signs anywhere around – that I could see anyway – for La Ruta Orwell. There were no signs anywhere around – that I could see anyway – for La Ruta Orwell. Like so much in Spain today to do with the Civil War, there is uncertainty about what place the Civil War should occupy. And of coure there is uncertainty – and in many cases, deep unease – about how to deal with the many scars that are there to see still to this day
Taking the road south out of Alcubierre, you veer to the west. There is a lot of desiccated vegetation and a white-grey ground which looks generally poor and unproductive. The road itself is good – it goes to Lecinena and then on into Zaragoza. As it climbs into the Monegros there are good views back toward Alcubierre and Monazon.
About 12 kms out on this road there is a small sign – quite easily missed – on the left hand size of the road: La Ruta Orwell. The sign leads onto a narrow unsealed road. Take it slowly. It goes uphill and winds for a bout 1.5 km. Then you come to a fork in the road. There should be a sign for which direction to take at this point but it was missing when I was there. Take the left hand fork in the road. This veers around sharply in a horseshoe and goes to hill top just about visible from back where the fork in the road was. The restored site is just at the top there.

Spanish Civil War: Trench position where Orwell fought
It is an impressive re-construction. There are explanatory panels giving good background on the Alcubierre Front and on Orwell’s own observations. It is possible to see clearly from the vantage point of this restored frontline position what Orwell meant when he said ‘Now that I had seen the front I was profound disgusted’. The fascist positions were on the far off hills and the soldiers manning those position could barely be seen. The cold and boredom occupied Orwell’s day. There are occasional brushes with the enemy but there is a sense of no real movement. In another important observation made at this stage by Orwell, he explains how different the army is that he is now a member of is from a ‘traditional army’ – he spent some time in the British Army of course. He said ‘.., There was no military rank in the ordinary sense; not titles, no badges, no heel-clicking and saluting. They had attempted to produce within the militias a sort of temporary working of the classless society.’
A good deal of information is provided at the site. It is impressive and the general overview provided is good. One can see clearly the lie of the land – the difficulty in the terrain.
Overall is it well worth a visit. Armed with a copy of Homage To Catalonia you get a good feel for what it must’ve been like. You cannot escape though the sense of betrayal that Orwell unveils in HTC. Militias were fighting for a new society armed with outdated weapons. Yet not so far away, behind the front lines, the police and Guardia Civil were being armed with the latest weaponry for the eventual purpose of suppressing the revolution.
See also Ruta Orwell Monegros